Global managed aquifer recharge potential as a solution to water scarcity

Global managed aquifer recharge potential as a solution to water scarcity

  • Rosa, L. Adapting agriculture to climate change via sustainable irrigation: biophysical potentials and feedbacks. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 063008 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tack, J., Barkley, A. & Hendricks, N. Irrigation offsets wheat yield reductions from warming temperatures. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 114027 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuang, X. et al. The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle. Science 383, eadf0630 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor, R. G. et al. Ground water and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 322–329 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, L., Chiarelli, D. D., Tu, C., Rulli, M. C. & D’Odorico, P. Global unsustainable virtual water flows in agricultural trade. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 114001 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Döll, P., Müller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T. & Eicker, A. Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resour. Res. 50, 5698–5720 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodell, M. et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557, 651–659 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Graaf, I. E. M., Gleeson, T., Rens Van Beek, L. P. H., Sutanudjaja, E. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping. Nature 574, 90–94 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Niazi, H. et al. Global peak water limit of future groundwater withdrawals. Nat. Sustain. 7, 413–422 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davis, K. F., Rulli, M. C., Seveso, A. & D’Odorico, P. Increased food production and reduced water use through optimized crop distribution. Nat. Geosci. 10, 919–924 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmitt, R. J. P., Rosa, L. & Daily, G. C. Global expansion of sustainable irrigation limited by water storage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2214291119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmitt, R. J. P. & Rosa, L. Dams for hydropower and irrigation: trends, challenges, and alternatives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 199, 114439 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kahn, M., Sangiorgio, M. & Rosa, L. Potential of wastewater reuse to alleviate water scarcity under future warming scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 034012 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Vliet, M. T. H. et al. Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 024020 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, L., Gabrielli, P. & Sangiorgio, M. Global energy, costs, and emissions from reverse osmosis desalination under future water scarcity. Water Res. 289, 124825 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siddik, M. A. B., Dickson, K. E., Rising, J., Ruddell, B. L. & Marston, L. T. Interbasin water transfers in the United States and Canada. Sci. Data 10, 27 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mekonnen, M. M. et al. Trends and environmental impacts of virtual water trade. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 890–905 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lord, J. et al. Global potential for harvesting drinking water from air using solar energy. Nature 598, 611–617 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 87–101 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dillon, P. et al. Sixty years of global progress in managed aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol. J. 27, 1–30 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levintal, E. et al. Agricultural managed aquifer recharge (Ag-MAR)—a method for sustainable groundwater management: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 291–314 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He, X. et al. Climate-informed hydrologic modeling and policy typology to guide managed aquifer recharge. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe6025 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kocis, T. N. & Dahlke, H. E. Availability of high-magnitude streamflow for groundwater banking in the Central Valley, California. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 084009 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kourakos, G., Brunetti, G., Bigelow, D. P., Wallander, S. & Dahlke, H. E. Optimizing managed aquifer recharge locations in California’s Central Valley using an evolutionary multi-objective genetic algorithm coupled with a hydrological simulation model. Water Resour. Res. 59, e2022WR034129 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Q. & Scanlon, B. R. How much water can be captured from flood flows to store in depleted aquifers for mitigating floods and droughts? A case study from Texas, US. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 054011 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dillon, P., Fernández Escalante, E., Megdal, S. B. & Massmann, G. Managed aquifer recharge for water resilience. Water 12, 1846 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodell, M. & Famiglietti, J. S. The potential for satellite-based monitoring of groundwater storage changes using GRACE: the High Plains aquifer, Central US. J. Hydrol. 263, 245–256 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Famiglietti, J. S. in Geophysical Monograph Series Vol. 150 (eds Sparks, R. S. J. & Hawkesworth, C. J.) 197–207 (American Geophysical Union, 2004).

  • Clarke, B., Otto, F., Stuart-Smith, R. & Harrington, L. Extreme weather impacts of climate change: an attribution perspective. Environ. Res. Clim. 1, 012001 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, J., Van Dyke, M. I. & Huck, P. M. Water reuse through managed aquifer recharge (MAR): assessment of regulations/guidelines and case studies. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 51, 357–376 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alam, S., Gebremichael, M., Li, R., Dozier, J. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Can managed aquifer recharge mitigate the groundwater overdraft in California’s Central Valley? Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027244 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ganot, Y. et al. Managed aquifer recharge with reverse-osmosis desalinated seawater: modeling the spreading in groundwater using stable water isotopes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 6323–6333 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goharian, E., Azizipour, M., Sandoval-Soils, S. & Fogg, G. E. Surface reservoir reoperation for managed aquifer recharge: folsom reservoir system. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 146, 04020095 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Speijer, L. et al. Enhancing groundwater recharge in drinking water protection zones in Flanders (Belgium): a novel approach to assess stormwater managed aquifer recharge potential. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 53, 101747 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alam, M. F. & Pavelic, P. Underground Transfer of Floods for Irrigation (UTFI): Exploring Potential at the Global Scale (International Water Management Institute, 2020); https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109588, https://doi.org/10.5337/2020.204

  • Martinsen, G. et al. Large-scale hydrological modeling in a multi-objective uncertainty framework – assessing the potential for managed aquifer recharge in the North China Plain. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 41, 101097 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brindha, K. & Pavelic, P. Identifying priority watersheds to mitigate flood and drought impacts by novel conjunctive water use management. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 399 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carlson, G. et al. Intensive irrigation buffers groundwater declines in key European breadbasket. Nat. Water https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00445-4 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dangar, S. & Mishra, V. Natural and anthropogenic drivers of the lost groundwater from the Ganga River basin. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 114009 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Panda, D. K., Ambast, S. K. & Shamsudduha, M. Groundwater depletion in northern India: impacts of the sub-regional anthropogenic land-use, socio-politics and changing climate. Hydrol. Process. 35, e14003 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. & Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035013 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scanlon, B. R., Longuevergne, L. & Long, D. Ground referencing GRACE satellite estimates of groundwater storage changes in the California Central Valley, USA. Water Resour. Res. 48, 2011WR011312 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, P.-W. et al. Groundwater depletion in California’s Central Valley accelerates during megadrought. Nat. Commun. 13, 7825 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farkas, J. Z., Hoyk, E. & Rakonczai, J. Geographical analysis of climate vulnerability at a regional scale: the case of the Southern Great Plain in Hungary. Hung. Geogr. Bull. 66, 129–144 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, Y., Vanderzalm, J., Hartog, N., Escalante, E. F. & Stefan, C. The 21st century water quality challenges for managed aquifer recharge: towards a risk-based regulatory approach. Hydrogeol. J. 31, 31–34 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ross, A. & Hasnain, S. Factors affecting the cost of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) schemes. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 4, 179–190 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dillon, P. J., Alley, W., Zheng, Y. & Vanderzalm, J. Managed Aquifer Recharge: Overview and Governance (International Association of Hydrogeologists, 2022).

  • Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Environment Protection and Heritage Council, and National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling: Managing Health and Environmental Risks (Phase 2). Managed Aquifer Recharge. 252 https://www.waterquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/water-recycling-guidelines-mar-24.pdf (2009).

  • Jasechko, S. Global cases of groundwater recovery after interventions. Science 391, 1218–1228 (2026).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mehta, P. et al. Half of twenty-first century global irrigation expansion has been in water-stressed regions. Nat. Water 2, 254–261 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Puy, A., Borgonovo, E., Lo Piano, S., Levin, S. A. & Saltelli, A. Irrigated areas drive irrigation water withdrawals. Nat. Commun. 12, 4525 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Citrini, A., Sangiorgio, M. & Rosa, L. Global multi-model trends of unsustainable irrigation under climate change scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 104011 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lehner, B. & Grill, G. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrol. Process. 27, 2171–2186 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rateb, A. et al. Comparison of groundwater storage changes from GRACE satellites with monitoring and modeling of major U.S. aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027556 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Save, H., Bettadpur, S. & Tapley, B. D. High-resolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 7547–7569 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watkins, M. M., Wiese, D. N., Yuan, D., Boening, C. & Landerer, F. W. Improved methods for observing Earth’s time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 120, 2648–2671 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodell, M. et al. The global land data assimilation system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85, 381–394 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beaudoing, H. GLDAS VIC Land Surface Model L4 monthly 1.0 x 1.0 degree V2.1. NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center https://doi.org/10.5067/VWTH7S6218SG (2020).

  • Zhao, G. et al. Decoupling of surface water storage from precipitation in global drylands due to anthropogenic activity. Nat. Water 3, 80–88 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Messager, M. L., Lehner, B., Grill, G., Nedeva, I. & Schmitt, O. Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach. Nat. Commun. 7, 13603 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E. & Terpenning, I. STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on Loess. J. Off. Stat. 6, 3–37 (1990).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sen, P. K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s Tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63, 1379–1389 (1968).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Theil, S. A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. Indag. Math. 12, 173 (1950).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zsoter, E. River discharge historical data from the Global Flood Awareness System. Climate Data Store https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.a4fdd6b9 (2019).

  • Van Der Knijff, J. M., Younis, J. & De Roo, A. P. J. LISFLOOD: a GIS-based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 24, 189–212 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harrigan, S. et al. GloFAS-ERA5 operational global river discharge reanalysis 1979–present. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 2043–2060 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H. & Kabat, P. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 5041–5059 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dahlke, H. E. et al. in Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection Vol. 3 (eds Friesen, J. & Rodríguez-Sinobas, L.) Ch. 8 (Elsevier, 2018).

  • Marr, J., Arrate, D., Maendly, R., Dhillon, D. & Stygar, S. Flood-MAR: Using Flood Water for Managed Aquifer Recharge to Support Sustainable Water Resources (California Department of Water Resources, 2018).

  • Niswonger, R. G., Morway, E. D., Triana, E. & Huntington, J. L. Managed aquifer recharge through off-season irrigation in agricultural regions. Water Resour. Res. 53, 6970–6992 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alam, S., Borthakur, A., Ravi, S., Gebremichael, M. & Mohanty, S. K. Managed aquifer recharge implementation criteria to achieve water sustainability. Sci. Total Environ. 768, 144992 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huscroft, J., Gleeson, T., Hartmann, J. & Börker, J. Compiling and mapping global permeability of the unconsolidated and consolidated Earth: GLobal HYdrogeology MaPS 2.0 (GLHYMPS 2.0). Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1897–1904 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ulibarri, N., Escobedo Garcia, N., Nelson, R. L., Cravens, A. E. & McCarty, R. J. Assessing the feasibility of managed aquifer recharge in California. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR029292 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dahlke, H. E., Brown, A. G., Orloff, S., Putnam, D. & O’Geen, T. Managed winter flooding of alfalfa recharges groundwater with minimal crop damage. Calif. Agric. 72, 1–11 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S. & Döll, P. MIRCA2000—Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: a new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, 2008GB003435 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laborte, A. G. et al. RiceAtlas, a spatial database of global rice calendars and production. Sci. Data 4, 170074 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kurylyk, B. L. & Watanabe, K. The mathematical representation of freezing and thawing processes in variably-saturated, non-deformable soils. Adv. Water Resour. 60, 160–177 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heinze, T. A multi-phase heat transfer model for water infiltration into frozen soil. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2021WR030067 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bouwer, H. Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 121–142 (2002).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, Y. et al. Characteristics and variability of winter northern Pacific atmospheric river flavors. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 127, e2022JD037105 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Freeze, R. A. & Cherry, J. A. Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, 1979).

  • Kebede, E. et al. A global open-source dataset of monthly irrigated and rainfed cropped areas (MIRCA-OS) for the 21st century. HydroShare https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.60a890eb841c460192c03bb590687145 (2024).

  • Gad, M., Abdelhaleem, H. M. & Waleed, O. A. S. Forecasting the seepage loss for lined and un-lined canals using artificial neural network and gene expression programming. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 14, 2221775 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barkhordari, S. & Hashemy Shahdany, S. M. A systematic approach for estimating water losses in irrigation canals. Water Sci. Eng. 15, 161–169 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, L. et al. Potential for sustainable irrigation expansion in a 3 °C warmer climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29526–29534 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, L. & He, L. Global multi-model projections of green water scarcity risks in rainfed agriculture under 1.5 °C and 3 °C warming. Agric. Water Manage. 314, 109519 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, L. et al. Closing the yield gap while ensuring water sustainability. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 104002 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, L. & Sangiorgio, M. Global water gaps under future warming levels. Nat. Commun. 16, 1192 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gosling, S. N. et al. ISIMIP3a simulation data from the global water sector. ISIMIP Repository https://doi.org/10.48364/ISIMIP.398165.2 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hanasaki, N., Yoshikawa, S., Pokhrel, Y. & Kanae, S. A global hydrological simulation to specify the sources of water used by humans. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 789–817 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshida, T. et al. Inference of parameters for a global hydrological model: identifiability and predictive uncertainties of climate-based parameters. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR030660 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Müller Schmied, H. et al. The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2e: description and evaluation of modifications and new features. Geosci. Model Dev. 17, 8817–8852 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, Z. et al. Reconstruction of global gridded monthly sectoral water withdrawals for 1971–2010 and analysis of their spatiotemporal patterns. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 2117–2133 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siebert, S., Henrich, V., Frenken, K. & Burke, J. Update of the Digital Global Map of Irrigation Areas to Version 5 Vol. 10, 2660–6728 (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013).

  • Citrini, A. et al. Supplementary Information for “Global managed aquifer recharge potential as a solution to water scarcity”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15731808 (2026).

  • Comments

    No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *