Mechanics and engineering models of tissue remodelling during tumour progression

Mechanics and engineering models of tissue remodelling during tumour progression

  • Linke, J. A., Munn, L. L. & Jain, R. K. Compressive stresses in cancer: characterization and implications for tumour progression and treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 24, 768–791 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hayakawa, K., Hirata, H., Samsonov, M. & Sokabe, M. Planar compression of extracellular substrates induces S-phase arrest via ATM-independent CHK2 activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 506, 983–989 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, A. M. K., Froman-Glover, C., Mistry, A., Yaddanapudi, K. & Chen, J. The impact of compression and confinement in tumor growth and progression: emerging concepts in cancer mechanobiology. Front. Mater. 12, 1492438 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xue, S. L. Tissue stresses caused by invasive tumour: a biomechanical model. J. Royal Soc. Interface 22, 20240797 (2025).

  • Kalli, M. et al. Mechanical forces inducing oxaliplatin resistance in pancreatic cancer can be targeted by autophagy inhibition. Commun. Biol. 7, 1581– (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Massey, A. et al. Mechanical properties of human tumour tissues and their implications for cancer development. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 269–282 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nia, H. T. et al. Solid stress and elastic energy as measures of tumour mechanopathology. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0004 (2017).

  • Salavati, H., Debbaut, C., Pullens, P. & Ceelen, W. Interstitial fluid pressure as an emerging biomarker in solid tumors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) – Rev. Cancer 1877, 188792 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hadjigeorgiou, A. G. & Stylianopoulos, T. Evaluation of growth-induced, mechanical stress in solid tumors and spatial association with extracellular matrix content. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 22, 1625–1643 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mao, Y. & Wickström, S. A. Mechanical state transitions in the regulation of tissue form and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 654–670 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antunes, M., Pereira, T., Cordeiro, J. V., Almeida, L. & Jacinto, A. Coordinated waves of actomyosin flow and apical cell constriction immediately after wounding. J. Cell Biol. 202, 365–379 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pereira, D., Richert, A., Medjkane, S., Hénon, S. & Weitzman, J. B. Cell geometry and the cytoskeleton impact the nucleo-cytoplasmic localisation of the smyd3 methyltransferase. Sci. Rep. 10, 20598– (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Niraula, G., Pyne, A. & Wang, X. Develop tandem tension sensor to gauge integrin-transmitted molecular forces. ACS Sens. 9, 3660–3670 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shimolina, L. et al. Comparison of viscoelastic properties of breast cancer and normal cells using AFM, FLIM, and TOF-SIMS techniques. Sci. Rep. 16, 1655– (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pogoda, K. et al. Unique role of vimentin networks in compression stiffening of cells and protection of nuclei from compressive stress. Nano Lett. 22, 4725–4732 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bulteau, R. et al. Atomic force microscopy reveals differences in mechanical properties linked to cortical structure in mouse and human oocytes. Small 21, 2500221 (2025).

  • Heyn, J. C., Juanatey, M. A., Falcke, M. & Rädler, J. O. Cell-mechanical parameter estimation from 1D cell trajectories using simulation-based inference. PLoS One 20, e0310669 (2025).

  • Zhang, S. et al. Intravital measurements of solid stresses in tumours reveal length-scale and microenvironmentally dependent force transmission. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 1473–1492 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khan, M. H. R., Islam, M. T., Taraballi, F. & Righetti, R. Assessment of compression-induced solid stress, fluid pressure and mechanopathological parameters in cancers in vivo using poroelastography. Phys. Med. Biol. 68, 135014 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dwairy, M., Reddy, J. N. & Righetti, R. Predicting stress and interstitial fluid pressure in tumors based on biphasic theory. Comput. Biol. Med. 167, 107651 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bal, P. K., Ouzeri, A. & Arroyo, M. Continuum theory for the mechanics of curved epithelial shells by coarse-graining an ensemble of active gel cellular surfaces. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 208, 106477 (2026).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ebadi, Y., Shih, E. D., Barocas, V. H. & Alford, P. W. A continuum model for tissues with moderate cell density. Comput. Biol. Med. 197, 111025 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miller, C. T., Gray, W. G. & Schrefler, B. A. A continuum mechanical framework for modeling tumor growth and treatment in two- and three-phase systems. Arch. Appl. Mech. 92, 461 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farhadifar, R., Röper, J. C., Aigouy, B., Eaton, S. & Jülicher, F. The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr. Biol. 17, 2095–2104 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lange, Z., Matthäus, F. & Qiu, M. Vertex models capturing subcellular scales in epithelial tissues. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1012993 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Masola, V., Franchi, M., Leitinger, B. & Mierke, C. T. Ecm mechanics control jamming-to-unjamming transition of cancer cells. Cells 14, 943 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mimura, T. & Inoue, Y. Cell-center-based model for simulating three-dimensional monolayer tissue deformation. J. Theor. Biol. 571, 111560 (2023).

  • Ruscone, M. et al. Multiscale model of the different modes of cancer cell invasion. Bioinformatics 39, btad374 (2023).

  • Runser, S., Vetter, R. & Iber, D. Simucell3d: three-dimensional simulation of tissue mechanics with cell polarization. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 299–309 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kong, W. et al. Experimental validation of force inference in epithelia from cell to tissue scale. Sci. Rep. 9, 14647– (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tah, I. et al. A minimal vertex model explains how the amnioserosa avoids fluidization during Drosophila dorsal closure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2322732121 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tan, M., Song, B., Zhao, X. & Du, J. The role and mechanism of compressive stress in tumor. Front. Oncol. 14, 1459313 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bertillot, F. et al. Compressive stress triggers fibroblasts spreading over cancer cells to generate carcinoma in situ organization. Commun. Biol. 7, 184– (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marcotti, S., Reilly, G. C. & Lacroix, D. Effect of cell sample size in atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 94, 259–266 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gong, X. et al. Adaptation to volumetric compression drives an apoptosis-resistant and invasive phenotype in liver cancer. Cancer Res. 85, 3156–3175 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pandey, M. et al. Mechanical compression regulates tumor spheroid invasion into a 3d collagen matrix. Phys. Biol. 21, 036003 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boyle, S. T. et al. Acute compressive stress activates rho/rock-mediated cellular processes. Small GTPases 11, 354–370 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mary, G. et al. Magnetic compression of tumor spheroids increases cell proliferation in vitro and cancer progression in vivo. Cancers 14, 366 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malhotra, N. et al. Potential toxicity of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles: a review. Molecules 25, 3159 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ho-Bouldoires, T. H. N. et al. Ret kinase-mediated mechanical induction of colon stem cells by tumor growth pressure stimulates cancer progression in vivo. Commun. Biol. 5, 137– (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bhandari, M. et al. Benchmarking mouse contamination removing protocols in patient-derived xenografts genomic profiling. npj Precis. Oncol. 9, 113– (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alamán-Díez, P. et al. Elevated interstitial fluid pressure promotes spheroid growth and reduces CAR-T therapeutic efficacy in solid tumors. Acta Biomater. 10, 10–27 (2026).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, S. et al. 3d microfluidic platform and tumor vascular mapping for evaluating anti-angiogenic RNAi-based nanomedicine. ACS Nano 15, 338–350 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barbazan, J. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts actively compress cancer cells and modulate mechanotransduction. Nat. Commun. 14, 6966– (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, Y. et al. Caf-driven mechanotransduction via collagen remodeling accelerates tumor cell cycle progression. Gels 11, 642 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hill, S. M. et al. Optimized in vitro three-dimensional invasion assay for quantifying a wide range of cancer cell invasive behavior. STAR Protoc. 3, 101516 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiang, S. P., Cabrera, R. M. & Segall, J. E. Tumor cell intravasation. Am. J. Physiol. – Cell Physiol. 311, C1 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tavasso, M. et al. Linking metastatic potential and viscoelastic properties of breast cancer spheroids via dynamic compression and relaxation in microfluidics. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 14, 2402715 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clevenger, A. J. et al. Rapid prototypable biomimetic peristalsis bioreactor capable of concurrent shear and multi-axial strain. Cells Tissues Organs 212, 96–110 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onal, S., Alkaisi, M. M. & Nock, V. Application of sequential cyclic compression on cancer cells in a flexible microdevice. PLOS ONE 18, e0279896 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y. et al. Compressive forces stabilize microtubules in living cells. Nat. Mater. 22, 913–924 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, M. et al. Compression enhances invasive phenotype and matrix degradation of breast cancer cells via piezo1 activation. BMC Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 1– (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. Compression drives diverse transcriptomic and phenotypic adaptations in melanoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2220062120 (2023).

  • Piplani, N., Roy, T., Saxena, N. & Sen, S. Bulky glycocalyx shields cancer cells from invasion-associated stresses. Transl. Oncol. 39, 101822 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barai, A. et al. Bulky glycocalyx drives cancer invasiveness by modulating substrate-specific adhesion. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae335 (2024).

  • Wang, X., Helenius, J., Müller, D. J. & Strohmeyer, N. Compressed cells facilitate adhesion through glycocalyx. Adv. Sci. 12, e13586 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kanyo, N. et al. Glycocalyx regulates the strength and kinetics of cancer cell adhesion revealed by biophysical models based on high resolution label-free optical data. Sci. Rep. 10, 22422– (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Furukawa, K. T., Yamashita, K., Sakurai, N. & Ohno, S. The epithelial circumferential actin belt regulates Yap/Taz through nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Merlin. Cell Rep. 20, 1435–1447 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tauriello, D. V., Sancho, E. & Batlle, E. Overcoming tgfβ-mediated immune evasion in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 22, 25–44 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Janus, P. et al. Transcriptional responses to direct and indirect TGFB1 stimulation in cancerous and noncancerous mammary epithelial cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 22, 522– (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dong, X. et al. Force interacts with macromolecular structure in the activation of tgf-β. Nature 542, 55–59 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Di-Luoffo, M. et al. Mechanical compressive forces increase PI3K output signaling in breast and pancreatic cancer cells. Life Sci. Alliance 8, e202402854 (2025).

  • Clevenger, A. J. et al. Oncogenic Kras mutations confer a unique mechanotransduction response to peristalsis in colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 23, 128–142 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vavourakis, V. et al. A validated multiscale in-silico model for mechano-sensitive tumour angiogenesis and growth. PLOS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005259 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Q. et al. Ezh2 reduction is an essential mechanoresponse for the maintenance of super-enhancer polarization against compressive stress in human periodontal ligament stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 11, 757– (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, M. et al. Erbb2 overexpression triggers transient high mechanoactivity of breast tumor cells. Cytoskeleton 69, 267–277 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fu, X. et al. An finite element analysis surrogate model with boundary oriented graph embedding approach for rapid design. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 10, 1026–1046 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jun, B. H. et al. Fabrication of a novel 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for complex cell culture models. Sci. Rep. 15, 10134– (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahmed, S. et al. An overview of recent advancements in targeted cancer therapies and their potential clinical impact. RSC Med. Chem. 17, 784-805 (2025).

  • Comments

    No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *